<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WorldWar-E™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldwar-e.us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com</link>
	<description>The Global Cyber War from MentalWardPublishing.com presented free by McGuinnessPublishing.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Adobe to fortify widely exploited Reader with security sandbox</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/08/adobe-to-fortify-widely-exploited-reader-with-security-sandbox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/08/adobe-to-fortify-widely-exploited-reader-with-security-sandbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Reader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adobe vulnerability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[malicious attacks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software flaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under criticism for being the world&#8217;s most exploited application, Adobe Systems&#8217; Reader program will soon include a security design that&#8217;s intended to thwart malicious attacks against end users.
Borrowing a page from engineers at Microsoft and Google, Adobe is adding the a so-called sandbox feature to Adobe Reader for Windows operating systems. The protected mode will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under criticism for being the world&#8217;s most exploited application, Adobe Systems&#8217; Reader program will soon include a security design that&#8217;s intended to thwart malicious attacks against end users.</p>
<p>Borrowing a page from engineers at Microsoft and Google, Adobe is adding the a so-called sandbox feature to Adobe Reader for Windows operating systems. The protected mode will run by default to force the document reader to run in a highly restricted environment that prevents the underlying PC from carrying out sensitive functions. Installing and deleting files, modifying the system registry and launching other programs will no longer be possible under most circumstances.<br />
Click here to find out more!</p>
<p>“The idea is to run the application with lower rights so that even if a bad guy figures out how to take over a process, they can&#8217;t do much with it,” Brad Arkin, Adobe&#8217;s senior director of product security and privacy, told El Reg. “The benefit to our customers is it adds another layer of defense so that even if there is a vulnerability that someone is able to exploit, the impact of that attack is diminished.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/20/adobe_reader_sandbox/">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/08/adobe-to-fortify-widely-exploited-reader-with-security-sandbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Removing SCADA worm could disrupt power plants</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/removing-scada-worm-could-disrupt-power-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/removing-scada-worm-could-disrupt-power-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Virus &amp; Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[malware attack]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SCADA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[siemens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[siemens worm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stuxnet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[supervisory control and data acquisition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Siemens has made a program available for detecting and disinfecting malware attacking its software used to control power grids, gas refineries, and factories but warned customers who use it could disrupt sensitive plant operations.
The Munich-based engineering company on Thursday began distributing Sysclean, a malware scanner made by Trend Micro. It has been updated to remove [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siemens has made a program available for detecting and disinfecting malware attacking its software used to control power grids, gas refineries, and factories but warned customers who use it could disrupt sensitive plant operations.</p>
<p>The Munich-based engineering company on Thursday began distributing Sysclean, a malware scanner made by Trend Micro. It has been updated to remove Stuxnet, a worm that spreads by exploiting two separate vulnerabilities in Siemens&#8217;s SCADA, or supervisory control and data acquisition, software and every supported version of Microsoft Windows.</p>
<p>“As each plant is individually configured, we cannot rule out the possibility that removing the virus may affect your plant in some way,” Siemens warned. The company also advised customers to keep the scanner updated because “there are currently some new derivative versions of the original virus around.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/22/siemens_scada_worm/">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/removing-scada-worm-could-disrupt-power-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpatched Windows shortcut flaw leaves users open to drive-by attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/unpatched-windows-shortcut-flaw-leaves-users-open-to-drive-by-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/unpatched-windows-shortcut-flaw-leaves-users-open-to-drive-by-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Cyber Alert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Exploits &amp; Hacks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Vulnerability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft on said that hackers could exploit the unpatched Windows  shortcut vulnerability using drive-by download attacks that would trigger an infection when people simply surf to a malicious website.
A noted vulnerability researcher confirmed that such attacks are possible.
In the revised security advisory, Microsoft acknowledged the new attack vector.
&#8220;An attacker could also set up a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft on said that hackers could exploit the unpatched Windows  shortcut vulnerability using drive-by download attacks that would trigger an infection when people simply surf to a malicious website.</p>
<p>A noted vulnerability researcher confirmed that such attacks are possible.</p>
<p>In the revised security advisory, Microsoft acknowledged the new attack vector.</p>
<p>&#8220;An attacker could also set up a malicious Web site or a remote network share and place the malicious components on this remote location,&#8221; the company said in the advisory. &#8220;When the user browses the website using a Web browser such as Internet Explorer or a file manager such as Windows Explorer, Windows will attempt to load the icon of the shortcut file, and the malicious binary will be invoked.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/unpatched-windows-shortcut-flaw-leaves-users-open-drive-attacks-181">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/unpatched-windows-shortcut-flaw-leaves-users-open-to-drive-by-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell revamps hardware testing in wake of malware issue</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/dell-revamps-hardware-testing-in-wake-of-malware-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/dell-revamps-hardware-testing-in-wake-of-malware-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Cyber Alert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Alerts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dell malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dell poweredge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dell server motherboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firmware malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sequence of errors led to Dell&#8217;s delivery of motherboards with malware  and the company is in the process of overhauling its testing process to resolve issues before dispatching hardware to customers, it said on Thursday.
Dell on Wednesday said that some replacement motherboards for PowerEdge servers may have contained the W32.Spybot worm in flash [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sequence of errors led to Dell&#8217;s delivery of motherboards with malware  and the company is in the process of overhauling its testing process to resolve issues before dispatching hardware to customers, it said on Thursday.</p>
<p>Dell on Wednesday said that some replacement motherboards for PowerEdge servers may have contained the W32.Spybot worm in flash storage. The malware issue affected a limited number of replacement motherboards in four servers, the PowerEdge R310, PowerEdge R410, PowerEdge R510 and PowerEdge T410 models, the company said.</p>
<p><span id="more-1604"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;There was a sequence of human errors that led to the issue, That being said, we have identified and implemented 16 additional process steps to make sure this doesn&#8217;t happen again,&#8221; said Dell spokesman Jim Hahn.</p>
<p>Hahn did not provide additional details on the steps being added to track and resolve such issues. But he said that all affected motherboards had been removed from the service supply chain. Current antivirus software with updated signatures would flag the malware&#8217;s presence and users would have to be running an unpatched version of Windows 2008 or an earlier version of the OS.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/dell-revamps-hardware-testing-in-wake-malware-issue-374">View the full report</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/dell-revamps-hardware-testing-in-wake-of-malware-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers Hear Mixed Reviews of Web Privacy Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/lawmakers-hear-mixed-reviews-of-web-privacy-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/lawmakers-hear-mixed-reviews-of-web-privacy-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Monitoring]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Rush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online privacy bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An online privacy bill introduced in the U.S. Congress this week received mixed reviews at a subcommittee hearing Thursday, with representatives of two trade groups saying the bill would put unnecessary regulations on the Internet advertising industry.
The Best Practices Act, introduced by Representative Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat, would require websites to get opt-in permission [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An online privacy bill introduced in the U.S. Congress this week received mixed reviews at a subcommittee hearing Thursday, with representatives of two trade groups saying the bill would put unnecessary regulations on the Internet advertising industry.</p>
<p>The Best Practices Act, introduced by Representative Bobby Rush, an Illinois Democrat, would require websites to get opt-in permission before sharing commonly collected consumer data with partners such as advertising networks, payment processors and Web analytics firms, said Mike Zaneis, vice president for public policy at the Interactive Advertising Bureau.<br />
<span id="more-1602"></span><br />
&#8220;The Internet is nothing but a series of third-party relationships,&#8221; Zaneis told the House Energy and Commerce Committee&#8217;s subcommittee on commerce, trade and consumer protection. &#8220;Virtually every website requires third-party data sharing.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill would also allow consumers to opt out of any data collection, and Zaneis suggested that would be unworkable for many online businesses. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s impossible to take information out of the information age,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If you do that, you&#8217;re going to get less relevant advertising, and less relevant advertising, by definition, is spam.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/201712/lawmakers_hear_mixed_reviews_of_web_privacy_bill.html">View the full report</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/lawmakers-hear-mixed-reviews-of-web-privacy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis: Google and China agree on a fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/analysis-google-and-china-agree-on-a-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/analysis-google-and-china-agree-on-a-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google China]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google renew china]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google.cn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google got its Chinese visa extended, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the company is having a good trip or that China&#8217;s censorship has gone away.
Google&#8217;s application to run Google.cn for another year looked like it was going to be denied by the Chinese government, who decided that simply redirecting all Google.cn users to an unfiltered search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google got its Chinese visa extended, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the company is having a good trip or that China&#8217;s censorship has gone away.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s application to run Google.cn for another year looked like it was going to be denied by the Chinese government, who decided that simply redirecting all Google.cn users to an unfiltered search site in Hong Kong wasn&#8217;t acceptable. Perhaps they found it a bit too clever and easy for Google.</p>
<p>Now Google has replaced the search box on Google.cn with a picture of a search box, which when clicked on takes the user to Google.hk.com adding another click between a Chinese citizen and unfiltered search results.</p>
<p><span id="more-1600"></span></p>
<p>That seems to have satisfied the Chinese authorities &#8212; and saved them some face &#8212; at least for the time being.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a testament to the power of Google that it can get away with what is really a shameless charade.</p>
<p>The problem is neither side is totally committed to their stated positions. The whole thing started when Google got hacked, letting an intruder get to source code and information on Chinese human rights activists.</p>
<p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/09/analysis.google.china/index.html#fbid=-DvLYXRpIr3">View the full article</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/analysis-google-and-china-agree-on-a-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kaspersky blocks BBC News over false phishing fears</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/kaspersky-blocks-bbc-news-over-false-phishing-fears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/kaspersky-blocks-bbc-news-over-false-phishing-fears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[False Information]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[incorrect classification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kaspersky]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kaspersky blocks BBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kaspersky&#8217;s security software created confusion on Wednesday after it blocked the redesigned BBC News site and other web properties.
The Russian security firm&#8217;s widely used Internet Security 2011 package labelled the revamped news site as a phishing risk, warning users against visiting it. The Auntie-blocking behaviour extended across a wide range of BBC sites, not just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaspersky&#8217;s security software created confusion on Wednesday after it blocked the redesigned BBC News site and other web properties.</p>
<p>The Russian security firm&#8217;s widely used Internet Security 2011 package labelled the revamped news site as a phishing risk, warning users against visiting it. The Auntie-blocking behaviour extended across a wide range of BBC sites, not just the flagship news site, until Kaspersky pulled the dodgy update late on Wednesday. In the interim surfers were confronted with the following unhelpful message:</p>
<p><em><strong>http://www.bbc.co.uk is used to steal passwords, credit card numbers and other confidential data. Access denied</strong></em></p>
<p>In an statement, Kaspersky apologised for the false positive, which it blamed on dodgy data from a third-party phishing blocklist supplier. It promised to improve its testing procedures to prevent a repetition of the incident.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/15/kaspersky_blocks_bbc_news/">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/kaspersky-blocks-bbc-news-over-false-phishing-fears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla snuffs password pilfering Firefox add-on</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/mozilla-snuffs-password-pilfering-firefox-add-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/mozilla-snuffs-password-pilfering-firefox-add-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Exploits &amp; Hacks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Alerts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cyersecurity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox add-on]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox plug-in]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[log-in sniffer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security concern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla has disabled and block-listed a Firefox add-on containing code that nabs login data sent to any website and reroutes it to a remote server.
The add-on — known as, um, Mozilla Sniffer — was uploaded to the Firefox add-on site on June 6, and the malicious code was discovered on Monday, after which the add-on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla has disabled and block-listed a Firefox add-on containing code that nabs login data sent to any website and reroutes it to a remote server.</p>
<p>The add-on — known as, um, Mozilla Sniffer — was uploaded to the Firefox add-on site on June 6, and the malicious code was discovered on Monday, after which the add-on was block-listed. This means netizens who installed the add-on will be prompted to remove it. Mozilla also says that, yes, anyone who has installed the add-on should change their web passwords tout de suite.</p>
<p>&#8220;If a user installs this add-on and submits a login form with a password field, all form data will be submitted to a remote location,&#8221; Mozilla said in a <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2010/07/13/add-on-security-announcement/"><em>blog post</em></a>, before adding that the remote server charged with collecting passwords appeared to be down.</p>
<p>According to Mozilla, the Sniffer was downloaded about 1,800 times, and as of Tuesday, there were 334 active users.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/15/mozilla_blocklists_malicious_addon/">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/mozilla-snuffs-password-pilfering-firefox-add-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle releases critical patches for database security</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/oracle-releases-critical-patches-for-database-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/oracle-releases-critical-patches-for-database-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oracle Critical Patch Updates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Flaw]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Vulnerability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software patch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle released a set of 59 patches on Monday to fix security vulnerabilities across its entire range of database, application, and middleware products.
The patches include fixes for three critical flaws affecting virtually every supported version of the company&#8217;s Database Server technology.
They were released as part of Oracle&#8217;s scheduled quarterly Critical Patch Updates, and included a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle released a set of 59 patches on Monday to fix security vulnerabilities across its entire range of database, application, and middleware products.</p>
<p>The patches include fixes for three critical flaws affecting virtually every supported version of the company&#8217;s Database Server technology.</p>
<p>They were released as part of Oracle&#8217;s scheduled quarterly Critical Patch Updates, and included a total of 28 fixes for remotely exploitable vulnerabilities, which it considers to be a critically important flaw because it allows for systems to be exploited over the network without the need for a username or password.</p>
<p><span id="more-1594"></span></p>
<p>Of the 59 patches announced today, 13 are for security problems in Oracle&#8217;s suite of database technologies. Three are critical because they address particularly dangerous flaws in all Oracle database server versions, said Josh Shaul, director of product management at Application Security, a New York-based security vendor.</p>
<p>One of the flaws, CVE-2010-0902, allows any user who is authenticated to an Oracle database to gain complete administrative control of it. &#8220;They can view the database, modify it, or shut down the database server. They can essentially become a database administrator,&#8221; Shaul said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/oracle-releases-critical-patches-database-security-205">View the full report</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/oracle-releases-critical-patches-for-database-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Apple takes the vulnerability crown</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/microsoft-apple-takes-the-vulnerability-crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/microsoft-apple-takes-the-vulnerability-crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Bug]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security Flaw]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[software vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwar-e.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC), COO Kevin Turner told attendees that Microsoft&#8217;s archrival Apple is now No. 1 in software vulnerabilities, with database rival Oracle in the No. 2 spot. It&#8217;s a tantalizing claim and good marketing for Microsoft, but does it point to deeper truths about the challenges Microsoft faces?
I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC), COO Kevin Turner told attendees that Microsoft&#8217;s archrival Apple is now No. 1 in software vulnerabilities, with database rival Oracle in the No. 2 spot. It&#8217;s a tantalizing claim and good marketing for Microsoft, but does it point to deeper truths about the challenges Microsoft faces?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where Turner got his data &#8212; the COO sourced his comments as &#8220;one of the last surveys that I saw in the marketplace&#8221; &#8212; but I&#8217;d guess it was Danish security research firm Secunia&#8217;s Half Year Report for 2010, which ranked Apple No. 1, Oracle No. 2, and Microsoft No. 3 in its list of the top 10 sources of software vulnerabilities. Not surprisingly, a close read of that report yields some data points that didn&#8217;t make it into Turner&#8217;s speech.</p>
<p>First, Apple&#8217;s ascendancy to the top of the reported vulnerabilities list isn&#8217;t really news. Measured by MITRE&#8217;s list of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, Apple has surpassed Microsoft in vulnerabilities for at least the last four years, but has only recently overtaken software giant Oracle, which takes the rap for vulnerabilities across a broad portfolio, including BEA  and Sun  products. In fact, Microsoft&#8217;s ranking has held steady at No. 3 since mid-2006 &#8212; which may be due to the company&#8217;s embrace of SDL (secure development lifecycle) in the last five years.</p>
<p>So how might Apple&#8217;s top rank be bad news for Microsoft? As the Secunia report points out, the discovery of software vulnerabilities correlates closely with the popularity of the platform itself. In other words, researchers and hackers are finding more holes in Apple&#8217;s operating system and applications because they&#8217;re paying more attention to an increasingly successful platform.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/security/microsoft-apple-takes-the-vulnerability-crown-263">Read more</a> »</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.worldwar-e.com/2010/07/microsoft-apple-takes-the-vulnerability-crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
